Schools of Ignorance – SBC Seminaries

Is man divine?

Now, either the Schools of Divinity are ignorant, or they want you to be.  The scriptures they use to proclaim MALE HEADSHIP do not give man divinity, but their interpretation of them, does.  Let’s play a game.   Every preschool child is taught to look at similar objects and find the one that does not fit.  So let’s do that with 1 Corinthians 11:3.

Example: Which fruit does not belong:  a grapefruit, an apple, an orange.  (Answer) The apple doesn’t belong because both the grapefruit and the orange are citrus fruits.

 Which one does not belong in 1 Corinthians 11:3?: “..the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.” (Answer:  Christ and God are divine.  Man is not. So the head of the woman is man does not belong. )  Why did Paul insert that in this scripture?  Here he was giving the women an illustration that they would understand. Read down below for an explanation for Ephesians 5:22-24.

The Danvers Statement on Biblical Manhood and Biblical Womanhood seeks to give Divinity to man.  And Baptists are swallowing it like nectar.

Now lets look at another scripture used to give man divinity.

Ephesians 5:22-24.

“Wives, submit to your husbands as to in the Lord, For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything…….(32) This is a profound mystery-but I am talking about Christ and the church. However, each one of you also must love his wife as he loves himself, and the wife must respect her husband.”

 Paul was speaking in his present time.  He was just repeating a condition that existed.  They knew it, and they understood it.  So when he uses this example of women submitting to their husbands, he is talking about how they were already living.  He carries it a little further and explains that this is the way they are to submit to Christ, who is the head of the church. He sums this up by saying that he is talking about the church, and that each one of the men must love their wife, and the wife must respect her husband.”

 That time has passed.  In this instruction, Paul is not speaking to us today.  He is simply giving them an instruction with an example that makes it easier for them to understand.  If he were to stand before a 21st century woman, he would use a different example.

In all of these explanations, Paul is saying “Look, following and obeying Christ, is like a marriage between a husband and a wife.”  And we know in those days, the husband held all the advantages (just as Jesus does), and the woman really only brought her money and obedience to a marriage.  She would understand this concept perfectly.  Notice, he doesn’t tell the wives to love Christ.

Fast forward 2000 years, women are not property today.  Women were denied rights until recently, but we have forgotten how completely men controlled the marriages.  They will again if the authors and promoters of the Danvers Statement on Biblical Manhood and Biblical Womanhood have their way.

Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary in Ft Worth has adopted the Danvers Statement (see other posts regarding this).  This statement proclaims the divinity of man. So is SWTBS a School of Ignorance?

Advertisements

About bwebaptistwomenforequality

Shirley Taylor writes with humor and common sense, challenging the church body to reclaim equality for Christian women.
This entry was posted in 1 Corinthians 11:3 explained, Scriptures explained, The Danvers Statement on Biblical Manhood and Biblical Womanhood and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Schools of Ignorance – SBC Seminaries

  1. I hope it’s Ok to do this, Shirley. I have an excerpt from “Woman this is War!…” on my blog that deals with 1 Corinthians 11:3 in detail. http://womansubmit.blogspot.com/2009/06/1-corinthians-113-headship-or-lordship.html

    The traditional role religionist interpretation of “head” as “authority” does not fit the context of this verse at all. Also, complementarians tend to ascribe all references to “God” as references specifically to the Father. In spite of lip service to the contrary, the Father is really the only member of the Godhead they recognize as being God.

    The head of Christ is God? Christ IS God.

    Like

  2. Coach Purses says:

    I do not believe I’ve seen this said in such an informative way before. You really have cleared this up for me. Thank you!

    Like

    • So sorry I didn’t see this before day so I could reply. (It got put to Spam – but I have changed that!) Most people sitting in the church pews today have no idea what is going on. I am trying to bring this to their attention by this blog. Please continue reading. And pass it on. Thanks!

      Like

  3. Pedant says:

    Actually it’s “both the grapefruit and the orange ARE citrus fruits”

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s